GPWS vs EGPWS

by | Feb 2, 2023 | Editorial | 0 comments

Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS) and Enhaced Proximity Warning System (EGPWS) are safety systems that are installed on aircraft to provide pilots with visual and auditory warnings of potential ground collisions. GPWS utilizes a combination of altitude, airspeed, aircraft configuration data and height over the terrain to monitor the aircraft’s position and trajectory relative to the ground, and provides warnings to the pilots when it determines that the aircraft is at risk of colliding with the ground.

GPWS was developed in the 1970s in response to a high number of controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) accidents, which occur when an aircraft is unintentionally flown into the ground or an obstacle.

CFIT accidents can be caused by a variety of factors, including poor weather conditions, navigational errors, or pilot disorientation.
GPWS was designed to help prevent these types of accidents by providing pilots with timely and accurate information about the aircraft’s position and altitude, and by alerting them to any potential hazards.

GPWS consists of a computer system that is installed on the aircraft, along with a series of sensors and transducers that measure various parameters such as altitude, airspeed, and aircraft configuration. The system uses this data to calculate the aircraft’s position and trajectory relative to the ground, and to determine whether there is a risk of collision. If the system detects a potential collision, it sends a warning to the pilots through a series of visual and auditory alerts.

There are several types of GPWS warnings, including terrain warning, altitude warning, and excessive descent rate warning. Terrain warning is activated when the aircraft is flying too low and is at risk of colliding with the ground or an obstacle. Altitude warning is activated when the aircraft is flying too low or too high relative to the ground. Excessive descent rate warning is activated when the aircraft is descending too rapidly, which could lead to a collision with the ground or an obstacle.

GPWS has proven to be highly effective in reducing the number of CFIT accidents. Since its introduction, GPWS has helped to prevent numerous accidents and save countless lives.

However, GPWS is not a substitute for good judgment and decision-making by pilots, and it is important for pilots to use all available resources and follow established procedures when flying in order to ensure the safety of their flights.

In addition to GPWS, there are other safety systems that are designed to help prevent CFIT accidents, including terrain awareness and warning systems (TAWS) and enhanced ground proximity warning systems (EGPWS). TAWS is an advanced version of GPWS that uses more sophisticated sensors and algorithms to provide pilots with a more detailed and accurate picture of the aircraft’s position and trajectory relative to the ground. EGPWS is a further evolution of TAWS that includes additional features such as wind shear detection and in-flight obstacle avoidance.

Overall, GPWS is an important safety system that has helped to significantly reduce the number of CFIT accidents and save countless lives. By providing pilots with timely and accurate information about the aircraft’s position and altitude, GPWS helps to ensure the safety of aircraft, passengers, and crew.various types of Honeywell EGPWS

In 1996 was first introduced the EGPWS, where “E” stands for Enhanced.
The new EGPWS system adds to the basic 5 modes of the GPWS a global map of the terrain so that it doesn’t work only scanning the terrain below the airplane with the Radio Altimeters but can alert the crew of obstacles and terrain ahead of the airplane’s path, by knowing the position and comparing with the terrain database.
EGPWS will alert che crew with Cautions or Warnings, according to the predicted time to impact (60 or 30 seconds).
It’s “sensitivity” (closure to terrain) is reduced thanks to a function, called TCF (Terrain Clearance Floor) when the airplane is approaching an airport runway for landing.

GPWS vs EGPWS

Tags related to this event: CFITEGPWSEGPWS recovery manoeuvreEGPWS warningGPWSTAWS

Aeroflot-Nord – Boeing – B737-505 (VP-BKO) flight AFL821

On September 13, 2008 an Aeroflot–Nord flight crew (Captain and Co-pilot), were conducting a scheduled domestic passenger flight No. AFL 821 on a B-737-505 aircraft, registration VP-BKO, from Moscow (Sheremetyevo, UUEE) to Perm (Bolshoye Savino, USPP). Apart from the...

Metrojet – Airbus A321-231 (EI-ETJ) flight KGL9268

The Egyptian International investigation committee has released today, December 14th 2015 a statement regarding the Metrojet flight KGL9268 crash. The preliminary report has been disclosed only to ICAO, to the accredited representatives of the States that  are...

Sichuan Airlines – Airbus – A319 (B-6054) flight 3U8949

Sichuan Airlines flight 3U8949 was an Airbus A319 (B-6054) . The plane took off from Chongqing airport at 07:45. At 08:47, the flight crew confirmed that the special report about the thunderstorms at Destination airport (see Appendix I) sent by CSC Dispatching Office...

JAPAN AIRLINES – BOEING B767-300 (JA610J) flight JAL877

The history of the JAPAN AIRLINES flight JAL877 is summarized as below, based on the data from digital flight data recorder (DFDR) and the statements of the pilot in command (PIC), the first officer (FO), flight attendants (FAs) and an injured passenger. On November...

Brit Air – Canadair – CL600-2B19 (F-GRJS) flight AF5672

Brit Air flight AF5672 was on an ILS approach to runway 26 Left at Brest Guipavas aerodrome : the aeroplane deviated progressively to the left of the normal runway approach track. It passed above and then below the glide path and descended until it touched the ground...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *